Comments for Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas Hacking in a Free world Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:36:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= Comment on How to use flex and bison with qmake (my own way) by Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2009/11/22/how-to-use-flex-and-bison-with-qmake-my-own-way/comment-page-1/#comment-13408 Thomas Capricelli Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:36:50 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=254#comment-13408 Erm... no idea :-) Erm… no idea :-)

]]> Comment on How to use flex and bison with qmake (my own way) by Nathan http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2009/11/22/how-to-use-flex-and-bison-with-qmake-my-own-way/comment-page-1/#comment-13407 Nathan Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:34:39 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=254#comment-13407 Does this work when compiling under Windows with mingw? In other words, does Qt know where to find flex and bison there, or is this a Linux+Mac-only solution? Thanks! Does this work when compiling under Windows with mingw? In other words, does Qt know where to find flex and bison there, or is this a Linux+Mac-only solution? Thanks!

]]> Comment on Celery init scripts for Gentoo by Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2011/12/02/celery-init-scripts-for-gentoo/comment-page-1/#comment-13367 Thomas Capricelli Sat, 03 Dec 2011 16:36:54 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=353#comment-13367 I approve all non-spam comments, readers will know about your stuff. I'll contact you privately about merging scripts. I agree celery is awesome! :) I'm less convinced by rabbitmq, but redis is ok for me. I'm not fond of my antispam plugins either, but without <strong>both</strong> of them, i'm getting several spams a day and it was too painful to moderate. If anyone has some good (and free) wordpress antispam plugin, i'm all interested. I approve all non-spam comments, readers will know about your stuff. I’ll contact you privately about merging scripts.

I agree celery is awesome! :) I’m less convinced by rabbitmq, but redis is ok for me.

I’m not fond of my antispam plugins either, but without both of them, i’m getting several spams a day and it was too painful to moderate. If anyone has some good (and free) wordpress antispam plugin, i’m all interested.

]]> Comment on Celery init scripts for Gentoo by quantumsummers http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2011/12/02/celery-init-scripts-for-gentoo/comment-page-1/#comment-13366 quantumsummers Sat, 03 Dec 2011 15:49:22 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=353#comment-13366 Hey there, I have the not-so-obscure but certainly outdated overlay on gentoo.org with the celery (and related) ebuilds. I didn't know anyone was using them, since no one ever posted to the bug or emailed me stating as much, which I had requested. I have a bunch of updates in a private overlay I guess I should look at merging into my developer overlay along with Corentin's work and yours. In the case that you are interested in the celery ecosystem being included in the actual portage tree, please let me know via email or post to one of the bugs and I can get this pushed in. I kept it in my overlay due to what I perceived as a lack of interest from users. That said, I have been processing millions of jobs for the past couple years with a rabbitmq+celery cluster, its awesome. https://bugs.gentoo.org/342041 celeryd https://bugs.gentoo.org/342043 django-celery Also, for the record, the ebuilds in my official gentoo developer overlay do provide init scripts. http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/quantumsummers.git You may want to update your post to let your readers know about the above. Also, I hate your spam thing here, its full of fail with JS disabled Hey there, I have the not-so-obscure but certainly outdated overlay on gentoo.org with the celery (and related) ebuilds. I didn’t know anyone was using them, since no one ever posted to the bug or emailed me stating as much, which I had requested. I have a bunch of updates in a private overlay I guess I should look at merging into my developer overlay along with Corentin’s work and yours.

In the case that you are interested in the celery ecosystem being included in the actual portage tree, please let me know via email or post to one of the bugs and I can get this pushed in. I kept it in my overlay due to what I perceived as a lack of interest from users. That said, I have been processing millions of jobs for the past couple years with a rabbitmq+celery cluster, its awesome.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/342041 celeryd
https://bugs.gentoo.org/342043 django-celery

Also, for the record, the ebuilds in my official gentoo developer overlay do provide init scripts. http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/quantumsummers.git

You may want to update your post to let your readers know about the above.

Also, I hate your spam thing here, its full of fail with JS disabled

]]> Comment on Celery init scripts for Gentoo by Corentin Chary http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2011/12/02/celery-init-scripts-for-gentoo/comment-page-1/#comment-13364 Corentin Chary Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:19:19 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=353#comment-13364 Hi, You will probably be interested by my overlay http://git.iksaif.net/?p=portage.git, I recently rewrote some ebuilds for celery, django-celery and their dependencies. I also rewrote and init script for gentoo, it allow to launch celerydm celerybeat and/or celeryev. Hi,
You will probably be interested by my overlay http://git.iksaif.net/?p=portage.git, I recently rewrote some ebuilds for celery, django-celery and their dependencies. I also rewrote and init script for gentoo, it allow to launch celerydm celerybeat and/or celeryev.

]]> Comment on Activities gallery by Alex http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2008/11/02/activities-gallery/comment-page-1/#comment-13336 Alex Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:34:22 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=91#comment-13336 Nice and interesting, thank you :). Nice and interesting, thank you :) .

]]> Comment on Support for ‘long double’ in Qt tests. by Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2009/03/05/support-for-long-double-in-qt-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-12880 Thomas Capricelli Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:09:30 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=169#comment-12880 Fortunately, Qt does not support only those features that are available on all platforms. Of course, i see no use of 'long double' on ARM. But still, this exists and is very useful. Fortunately, Qt does not support only those features that are available on all platforms. Of course, i see no use of ‘long double’ on ARM. But still, this exists and is very useful.

]]> Comment on Support for ‘long double’ in Qt tests. by Ilkka Prusi http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2009/03/05/support-for-long-double-in-qt-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-12879 Ilkka Prusi Sun, 11 Sep 2011 11:40:57 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=169#comment-12879 That extended floating point (80-bit, long double) is not really supported on all platforms and compilers. Many CPUs does math in extended type internally but compilers such as MSVC does not support it. Rather, it's truncated silently by compiler to "double" from "long double".. Also on ARM Qt seems to use 32-bit float instead of 64-bit double for performance reasons -> not much cross-platform use in supporting long double. I agree that support for it would be nice but I don't see it coming anytime soon anyway, too many problems with different platforms. That extended floating point (80-bit, long double) is not really supported on all platforms and compilers.
Many CPUs does math in extended type internally but compilers such as MSVC does not support it. Rather, it’s truncated silently by compiler to “double” from “long double”..
Also on ARM Qt seems to use 32-bit float instead of 64-bit double for performance reasons -> not much cross-platform use in supporting long double.

I agree that support for it would be nice but I don’t see it coming anytime soon anyway, too many problems with different platforms.

]]> Comment on How to use flex and bison with qmake (my own way) by d4t4 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2009/11/22/how-to-use-flex-and-bison-with-qmake-my-own-way/comment-page-1/#comment-12538 d4t4 Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:20:10 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=254#comment-12538 Thanks a bunch! Thanks a bunch!

]]> Comment on Mercurial mirror for Django stable branch 1.3 by Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2011/04/07/mercurial-mirror-for-django-stable-branch-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-11385 Thomas Capricelli Fri, 08 Apr 2011 05:45:10 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=299#comment-11385 Oops, sorry! I did not notice because I was authentified on bitbucket. It's fixed now. Oops, sorry!
I did not notice because I was authentified on bitbucket. It’s fixed now.

]]> Comment on Mercurial mirror for Django stable branch 1.3 by Etienne http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2011/04/07/mercurial-mirror-for-django-stable-branch-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-11384 Etienne Fri, 08 Apr 2011 02:14:46 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=299#comment-11384 Hmm, seems you did not set the access rights correctly. I got: Error You do not have access to this repository. Hmm, seems you did not set the access rights correctly. I got:
Error
You do not have access to this repository.

]]> Comment on Mercurial mirror for Django stable branch 1.3 by Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2011/04/07/mercurial-mirror-for-django-stable-branch-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-11379 Thomas Capricelli Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:06:14 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=299#comment-11379 See my previous post for the reasons. I have tried to use them for ~one year before giving up. There's also the repository size gain. See my previous post for the reasons. I have tried to use them for ~one year before giving up. There’s also the repository size gain.

]]> Comment on Mercurial mirror for Django stable branch 1.3 by Paul http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2011/04/07/mercurial-mirror-for-django-stable-branch-1-3/comment-page-1/#comment-11377 Paul Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:44:58 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=299#comment-11377 You could also just use the official Django mirror on BitBucket. https://bitbucket.org/django/django/ Updated every 5 minutes. Contains all branches and tags. You could also just use the official Django mirror on BitBucket.

https://bitbucket.org/django/django/

Updated every 5 minutes. Contains all branches and tags.

]]> Comment on Youtube web shortcut by chetoz http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2008/07/20/youtube-web-shortcut/comment-page-1/#comment-11353 chetoz Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:53:53 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/blogs/orzel/?p=12#comment-11353 good good

]]> Comment on Activity extension for mercurial by Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2008/10/31/activity-extension-for-mercurial/comment-page-1/#comment-11292 Thomas Capricelli Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:20:44 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=66#comment-11292 Hi, Well, why not, but this (old) blog entry is really not the place for patch proposal.. please use the tracker from the homepage (there's even a tracker "patch"). Hi,

Well, why not, but this (old) blog entry is really not the place for patch proposal.. please use the tracker from the homepage (there’s even a tracker “patch”).

]]> Comment on Activity extension for mercurial by Jonathan http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2008/10/31/activity-extension-for-mercurial/comment-page-1/#comment-11288 Jonathan Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:12:45 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=66#comment-11288 This was almost exactly what I was looking for. My repository has a lot of auto generated stuff in it too though, which is useful but I don't really care about the activity of. I made a small modification to include the directories I was interested in (based upon version 1.4). <code> *** hgactivity-1.4/activity.py Thu Feb 10 13:48:48 2011 --- hgactivity-1.4-mod/activity.py Fri Mar 25 17:45:05 2011 *************** *** 124,129 **** --- 124,130 ---- ('', 'datemax', '', _('End date of the graph (yyyy-mm-dd)'), 'string'), ('', 'maxcaptions', 4, _('Maximum number of captions (when using --split).'), 'integer'), ('x', 'exclude', '', _('Comma-separated list of authors to ignore.'), 'string'), + ('i', 'include', '', _('Comma-separated list of directories to include.'), 'string'), ('', 'aliases', '', _('file with email aliases'), 'string'), ('', 'skipmerges', False, _('Do not consider merge commits')), ('l', 'uselines', False, _('Use the number of lines modified instead of the number of commits')), *************** *** 171,176 **** --- 172,183 ---- else: options.exclude = [] + include = opts.get('include') + if include: + options.include = include.split(',') + else: + options.include = [] + if hasattr(repo.changelog,'count'): options.length = repo.changelog.count() # mercurial 1.0.2 and previous else: *************** *** 301,307 **** if '' in dirs: dirs[dirs.index('')] = '' for dir in dirs: ! yield dir , localstat def convolution(datemin,datemax,data): date = datemin --- 308,315 ---- if '' in dirs: dirs[dirs.index('')] = '' for dir in dirs: ! if dir in options.include: ! yield dir , localstat def convolution(datemin,datemax,data): date = datemin </code> This was almost exactly what I was looking for. My repository has a lot of auto generated stuff in it too though, which is useful but I don’t really care about the activity of. I made a small modification to include the directories I was interested in (based upon version 1.4).


*** hgactivity-1.4/activity.py Thu Feb 10 13:48:48 2011
--- hgactivity-1.4-mod/activity.py Fri Mar 25 17:45:05 2011
***************
*** 124,129 ****
--- 124,130 ----
('', 'datemax', '', _('End date of the graph (yyyy-mm-dd)'), 'string'),
('', 'maxcaptions', 4, _('Maximum number of captions (when using --split).'), 'integer'),
('x', 'exclude', '', _('Comma-separated list of authors to ignore.'), 'string'),
+ ('i', 'include', '', _('Comma-separated list of directories to include.'), 'string'),
('', 'aliases', '', _('file with email aliases'), 'string'),
('', 'skipmerges', False, _('Do not consider merge commits')),
('l', 'uselines', False, _('Use the number of lines modified instead of the number of commits')),
***************
*** 171,176 ****
--- 172,183 ----
else:
options.exclude = []

+ include = opts.get('include')
+ if include:
+ options.include = include.split(',')
+ else:
+ options.include = []
+
if hasattr(repo.changelog,'count'):
options.length = repo.changelog.count() # mercurial 1.0.2 and previous
else:
***************
*** 301,307 ****
if '' in dirs:
dirs[dirs.index('')] = ''
for dir in dirs:
! yield dir , localstat

def convolution(datemin,datemax,data):
date = datemin
--- 308,315 ----
if '' in dirs:
dirs[dirs.index('')] = ''
for dir in dirs:
! if dir in options.include:
! yield dir , localstat

def convolution(datemin,datemax,data):
date = datemin

]]> Comment on About mercurial and permissions by Graham King » Unix shared directory permissions: GUID and umask http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2008/09/16/about-mercurial-and-permissions/comment-page-1/#comment-10171 Graham King » Unix shared directory permissions: GUID and umask Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:04:46 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/blogs/orzel/?p=16#comment-10171 [...] Mercurial and permissions Multiple Committers Change Ubuntu global umask Collaboration models [...] [...] Mercurial and permissions Multiple Committers Change Ubuntu global umask Collaboration models [...]

]]> Comment on announcing qxv by Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2010/10/04/announcing-qxv/comment-page-1/#comment-10010 Thomas Capricelli Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:34:01 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=290#comment-10010 Well, xiv is not a clone of xv and is (indeed) not cross platform. It's probably a great image viewer like a thousand others. The homepage makes me feel like it's a very old software, even though, yes, there was a release in 2010. It's weird that gentoo also has a "Modern rewrite of Quick Image Viewer" called pqiv. Actually, i think there's not even a control window. The purpose of qxv is to have a clone of xv. Well, xiv is not a clone of xv and is (indeed) not cross platform.
It’s probably a great image viewer like a thousand others. The homepage makes me feel like it’s a very old software, even though, yes, there was a release in 2010. It’s weird that gentoo also has a “Modern rewrite of Quick Image Viewer” called pqiv.
Actually, i think there’s not even a control window. The purpose of qxv is to have a clone of xv.

]]> Comment on announcing qxv by mikolaj http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2010/10/04/announcing-qxv/comment-page-1/#comment-10008 mikolaj Mon, 04 Oct 2010 08:39:44 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=290#comment-10008 Free alternative to xv was (and is) for veery long time qiv ( http://spiegl.de/qiv/ ). Big problem for me - no Windows version. You wouldn't do bad with copying some features of this program and/or keyboard shortcuts :) Free alternative to xv was (and is) for veery long time qiv ( http://spiegl.de/qiv/ ).

Big problem for me – no Windows version. You wouldn’t do bad with copying some features of this program and/or keyboard shortcuts :)

]]> Comment on Fixing qmake missing rule for *.ts -> *.qm by Mathieu http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2009/03/10/fixing-qmake-missing-rule-for-ts-qm/comment-page-1/#comment-9630 Mathieu Fri, 06 Aug 2010 07:14:00 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=186#comment-9630 Thanks a lot for the tip, it saved my day ! Thanks a lot for the tip, it saved my day !

]]> Comment on Announcing colibri 1.0 alpha1, a mailing list manager with a django based web interface by Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2010/04/03/announcing-colibri-10-alpha1-a-mailing-list-manager-with-a-django-based-web-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-8952 Thomas Capricelli Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:45:48 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=269#comment-8952 Thanks for your interest. There's no discussion group or mailing list yet. I will open something if enough people are interested, of course. Meanwhile, I can be reached on the freenode IRC network as orzel, channel #freehackers. Bounces are handled, but not as well as I would like, and it is not tested enough, this is the meaning of issue 651. "not as well" means that a bounce will be removed from the incoming spool (no loop) and not be forwarded back to the mailing list. I want those to be available in the admin interface, with proper stats and actions to be performed by the admin (onhold, remove, reset..). Concerning single-link opt-out, it's not possible yet, but definitely a good idea. Do you mean a single, 'generic' url like domain.com/my@mailing.list/unsubscribe or a user-specific one ? The first option will still require the user to log in, and the second one means more work for the daemon (we need to generate a different mail for each user). Thanks for your interest.

There’s no discussion group or mailing list yet. I will open something if enough people are interested, of course. Meanwhile, I can be reached on the freenode IRC network as orzel, channel #freehackers.

Bounces are handled, but not as well as I would like, and it is not tested enough, this is the meaning of issue 651. “not as well” means that a bounce will be removed from the incoming spool (no loop) and not be forwarded back to the mailing list. I want those to be available in the admin interface, with proper stats and actions to be performed by the admin (onhold, remove, reset..).

Concerning single-link opt-out, it’s not possible yet, but definitely a good idea. Do you mean a single, ‘generic’ url like domain.com/my@mailing.list/unsubscribe or a user-specific one ?
The first option will still require the user to log in, and the second one means more work for the daemon (we need to generate a different mail for each user).

]]> Comment on Announcing colibri 1.0 alpha1, a mailing list manager with a django based web interface by Snake http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2010/04/03/announcing-colibri-10-alpha1-a-mailing-list-manager-with-a-django-based-web-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-8951 Snake Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:31:57 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=269#comment-8951 Hi, this looks really interesting - I was checking out alternatives to mailman just a few weeks ago - but found nothing convincing. Mailman, of course, is not really bad, but integration and customization feels somehow limited, also I would like to get rid of the mailman processes hanging around in memory - a django-based mailman interface was what I was thinking about as a "quick fix", of course, why not reinvent all the other stuff, if can be done better - I feel very comfortable about the fact, that you already started with the work, while I was just thinking... :) May I ask a few questions: * Is there a discussion group for this? * I am not sure if I understand this http://labs.freehackers.org/issues/651 does this mean, that there is no bounce handling right now? * Is it possible to put a very simple one- click opt-out link for every user into the mail text? Thanks! Hi, this looks really interesting – I was checking out alternatives to mailman just a few weeks ago – but found nothing convincing. Mailman, of course, is not really bad, but integration and customization feels somehow limited, also I would like to get rid of the mailman processes hanging around in memory – a django-based mailman interface was what I was thinking about as a “quick fix”, of course, why not reinvent all the other stuff, if can be done better – I feel very comfortable about the fact, that you already started with the work, while I was just thinking… :)

May I ask a few questions:
* Is there a discussion group for this?
* I am not sure if I understand this
http://labs.freehackers.org/issues/651
does this mean, that there is no bounce
handling right now?
* Is it possible to put a very simple one-
click opt-out link for every user into the
mail text?

Thanks!

]]> Comment on Announcing colibri 1.0 alpha1, a mailing list manager with a django based web interface by sitepedia http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2010/04/03/announcing-colibri-10-alpha1-a-mailing-list-manager-with-a-django-based-web-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-8893 sitepedia Sun, 04 Apr 2010 07:41:52 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=269#comment-8893 Wonderful job! I believe it's a very useful django app. Wonderful job!
I believe it’s a very useful django app.

]]> Comment on Playing with clang and Qt by illissius http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2010/01/10/playing-with-clang-and-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-8182 illissius Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:08:22 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=259#comment-8182 Oh, I see. That's still somewhat impressive. Oh, I see. That’s still somewhat impressive.

]]> Comment on Playing with clang and Qt by Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2010/01/10/playing-with-clang-and-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-8169 Thomas Capricelli Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:52:14 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=259#comment-8169 Of course...... fixed. Thanks for reporting. Of course…… fixed. Thanks for reporting.

]]> Comment on Playing with clang and Qt by arwa http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2010/01/10/playing-with-clang-and-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-8166 arwa Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:09:01 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=259#comment-8166 I think "-recusirve" might by a typo? I think “-recusirve” might by a typo?

]]> Comment on Playing with clang and Qt by Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2010/01/10/playing-with-clang-and-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-8159 Thomas Capricelli Mon, 11 Jan 2010 04:19:09 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=259#comment-8159 No, I did not test compiling Qt itself. I'm telling qmake to use clang for compiling instead of (say) gcc or visual studio. I manage to compile my project with this setup. At this stage, the main purpose is to test clang. No, I did not test compiling Qt itself. I’m telling qmake to use clang for compiling instead of (say) gcc or visual studio. I manage to compile my project with this setup. At this stage, the main purpose is to test clang.

]]> Comment on Playing with clang and Qt by illissius http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2010/01/10/playing-with-clang-and-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-8155 illissius Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:07:53 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=259#comment-8155 Wait, it compiles a functional Qt already? That's pretty amazing. Last I had heard it was building LLVM and linking, but the resulting binary was a long way off from working properly. Wait, it compiles a functional Qt already? That’s pretty amazing. Last I had heard it was building LLVM and linking, but the resulting binary was a long way off from working properly.

]]> Comment on How to use flex and bison with qmake (my own way) by Thomas Capricelli http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2009/11/22/how-to-use-flex-and-bison-with-qmake-my-own-way/comment-page-1/#comment-7617 Thomas Capricelli Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:13:07 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=254#comment-7617 Hey, great ;-) Hey, great ;-)

]]> Comment on How to use flex and bison with qmake (my own way) by shailesh http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/2009/11/22/how-to-use-flex-and-bison-with-qmake-my-own-way/comment-page-1/#comment-7615 shailesh Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:07:27 +0000 http://www.freehackers.org/thomas/?p=254#comment-7615 Hey Thanks a lot!!!. Was struggling with this for quite some time. Just what I was looking for :-) Hey Thanks a lot!!!. Was struggling with this for quite some time. Just what I was looking for :-)

]]>